Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ETMXのGASのループの確認 #28

Open
YoshinoriFujii opened this issue Sep 24, 2019 · 17 comments
Open

ETMXのGASのループの確認 #28

YoshinoriFujii opened this issue Sep 24, 2019 · 17 comments

Comments

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 24, 2019

Background

  • From the ITMX fact, I wanted to check the status and the idea of the filters

Ref

@YoshinoriFujii YoshinoriFujii changed the title ETMXのGASのループが理解できません。直していいですか。 ETMXのGASのループの確認 Sep 24, 2019
@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 24, 2019

Status check

  • start configuration:
    ETMX_GAS_config_before_modification

  • F0GAS
    -SUsMod looks the latest one.
    ETMX_GAS_meas_20190426_F0

ETMX_F0GAS_filter_before

ETMX_F0GAS_before


  • F1GAS
    ETMX_F1GAS_filter_before

ETMX_F1GAS_before


  • F2GAS is not avaiable

  • F3GAS
    ETMX_F3GAS_fiter_before

ETMX_F3GAS_before


  • BFGAS

ETMX_BFGAS_filter_before
ETMX_BFGAS_before

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

Before starting

ETMX_GAS_before_20190924

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 24, 2019

modification plans


  • F0GAS
    modification_plan_F0GAS
  • red: the currently implemented one
  • blue: which would be tested, the plan 1 (dcdamp_plan1)
  • green: the plan 2 (dcdamp_plan2)
  • Maybe I want to have infinite at lower frequency region.

  • F1GAS
    ETMX_F1GAS_plan

  • blue: the currently implemented one

  • red: which would be tested, the plan 1 (dcdamp_test)

  • green: the plan 2 (dc_plan)

  • Should I tale care of infinite amp. at lower frequency?


  • F3GAS

ETMX_F3GAS_modification_plan

  • blue: the currently implemented one
  • green: which would be tested, the plan 1 (dcdamp_test)
  • red: the plan 2 (dc_plan)
  • Should I tale care of infinite amp. at lower frequency?

  • BFGAS
    ETMX_BFGAS_modification_plan

  • blue: the currently implemented one

  • green: which would be tested, the plan 1 (dcdamp_test)

  • red: the plan 2 (dc_test)

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 25, 2019

2019.9.25 modification work

  • starting point:
    ETMX_GAS_before_modification_1152JST

  • After modification
    ETMX_GAS_after modification_test_1314JST

NOTE: LOOK_AT_TME!

  • I found that when I closed (dc+damp) for all the stages, it stated oscillating. Something looks weird, to be checked.

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

For 2019.9.25th 13:18JST condition:

  • I returned to the initial condition:

ETMX_GAS_config_before_modification

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 25, 2019

data:
/users/VIS/TypeA/general/LogNotes/20190924/ETMX

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 25, 2019

2019.9.26 long-term performance check

performance test

  • F0dcdamp + F1/F3/BFdc
    ETMX_GAS_F0dcdamp_F1F3BFdc_0731JST

ETMX_OUT_F0dcdamp_F1F3BFdc


  • F0F1dcdamp + F3/BFdc
    ETMX_GAS_F0F1dcdamp_F3BFdc

ETMX_GAS_OUT_F0F1dcdamp_F3BFdc

  • One peak appeared at ~2.8Hz. Did we have resonance?

  • F0F3dcdamp + F1/BFdc
    ETMX_GAS_F0F3dcdamp_F1BFdc

ETMX_GAS_OUT_F0F3dcdamp_F1BFdc


  • F0F3BFdcdamp + F1dc
    ETMX_GAS_F0F3BFdcdamp_F1dc

ETMX_GAS_OUT_F0F3BFdcdamp_F1dc

  • The RMS is reduced in the best, however, It looks that BF actuator is exciting a resonance at 2.8Hz.

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

Note

  • DO NOT FORGET TO ADD A NOTCH AT 9.7Hz.
    ETMX_GAS_mon_0824JST

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

I have added ~9.7Hz notch to all the F0/1/F3/BF-GAS loops.

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

check w/o controls

ETMX_AS_wo_cpntrol_20190926

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 26, 2019

sensor polarity looks aligned among the stages
image
at /users/VISsvn/TypeAtower/ETMX/Measurements/TF/Measurements/20190926/F1_GASexc.xml

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 26, 2019

Note: when the following configuration was used, F1-GAS start ringing up at 2.7Hz:
timeseries_after_F1ringing

  • This was observed at on F0, F1 and F3. The oscillation was not observed in BF-stage.

  • It looks due to a shortage of phase margin.
    -F1GAs was excited with F0dcdamp:
    image

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

2019.9.26, I finished with
ITMs_GAS_after_modification_1542JST

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

2019.9.27

old filter information:

  • at ETMX_F0_DAMP_GAS:
    • Filter7: notches
      notch(0.7244,10,30)notch(0.9462,10,30)notch(1.2823,10,30)notch(1.4454,10,30)

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Sep 26, 2019

  • btw, the modal sensor for Mode1 looks working somehow.

    • check the F0exc TF for the sensors,
    • For actuators?
      implemented_modal_mon_20190927
  • For actuators, starting from (F0, F1, F2,F3, BF) = (1,1,1,1,1), and then diagonalizing it, would work?

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Nov 16, 2019

Log on 2019.11.16

  • F0GAS loop modification:
    • try to shape the filters as:
stage current nominal [1] modification on Nov. 16th [2]
F0 dc+damp (UGF_2Hz) dc+damp (UGF_4.4Hz)
F1 dc dc
F2 --- ---
F3 dc+damp dc
BF dc dc

[1] FM5 (blue)
[2] FM7 (red)
image

@YoshinoriFujii
Copy link
Owner Author

YoshinoriFujii commented Nov 16, 2019

Note 2019.11.16

stage configuration
F0 dc+damp (UGF_2Hz)
F1 dc
F2 ---
F3 dc+damp
BF dc

image

  • 0.6Hz: appeared a bit though.

stage configuration
F0 dc+damp (UGF_2Hz)
F1 dc
F2 ---
F3 dc
BF dc

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant