You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a quick question, is there any specific reason not adding cifar&svhn datasets to the moco training script? like, it's not suitable or the performance is really bad on the small datasets?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We provided experiment results of MoCo on CIFAR in Appendix Table 9 of our paper. It could bring improvements over the baseline, but is not as much as using Rotation. My guess is that since MoCo needs a large number of (negative) samples to be effective, the smaller yet imbalanced datasets thus may not benefit much from MoCo, compared to those with larger size and more samples (such as ImageNet).
Thanks for the great repo!
I have a quick question, is there any specific reason not adding cifar&svhn datasets to the moco training script? like, it's not suitable or the performance is really bad on the small datasets?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: