You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 5, 2020. It is now read-only.
Currently the aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the cell elongation perpendicular to the flow by the elongation parallel to the flow. Could you invert this, so it is handled the same way as in the measurement software. Since elongation in flow direction is usually the one that grows, it somehow leaves you with a better intuition on the numbers and a somewhat broader scale. Example: one could go from 2 to 2.5 instead of 0.5 to 0.4 if more elongated (2.5x instead of 2x) cells shall be included.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
one more thing.
Currently the aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the cell elongation perpendicular to the flow by the elongation parallel to the flow. Could you invert this, so it is handled the same way as in the measurement software. Since elongation in flow direction is usually the one that grows, it somehow leaves you with a better intuition on the numbers and a somewhat broader scale. Example: one could go from 2 to 2.5 instead of 0.5 to 0.4 if more elongated (2.5x instead of 2x) cells shall be included.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: