Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trident & Throwable Return to Off-hand #150

Closed
Maxz752 opened this issue Nov 6, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Trident & Throwable Return to Off-hand #150

Maxz752 opened this issue Nov 6, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Maxz752
Copy link

Maxz752 commented Nov 6, 2022

I read project readme, checked client side and server side configurations, and no such feature exists - YES

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I like dual wielding a sword & a trident, but When I throw the Trident with my off-hand it does not return (by Loyalty, or just by picking up) to said off-hand & the next empty inventory slot is chosen instead.

Describe the solution you'd like
If the trident is thrown from off hand, next time you pick-up the trident it will come back to off-hand.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternatively if the trident is thrown from a slot, reserve said inventory slot until you pick it up & place the trident there (a more flexible setup).

Additional context
To be more precise I ran into this case in the mod Medieval Weaponry - dual wielding a javelin & a sickle.
So it would be nice to have compatibility with this mod & general fallback compatibility with any throwables.

Note: There is one mod for 1.19 that does that ("bettertridentreturn"), but it's only for the trident, it's not actively developed (to my knowledge) & it has no compatibility with mods.

@ZsoltMolnarrr
Copy link
Owner

Hello!
I understand the issue, since being a very item specific issue it is rather difficult to fix it.

@ZsoltMolnarrr ZsoltMolnarrr added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 7, 2022
@ZsoltMolnarrr
Copy link
Owner

After further investigation I decided this feature will not be implemented, due to being outside of project scope and already existing specific solutions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants