You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Scope code currently downloads and sums votes for each classification in a group of sources, but we do not yet have the code or strategy to grow the existing training set from that information. One potential strategy is:
Add all sources marked as 'Labelled' to the existing training set
Remove a classification if its votes sum to < 0
Keep a classification if its votes sum to >= 0
In cases of duplicate classifications, assign the probability from the one most recently posted
One problem with the above strategy is that there is ambiguity about the reliability of classifications with a net vote sum of 0. Perhaps no labeler was sure about that classification, or an even number disagreed - should it be kept or not?
Perhaps each newly added portion of the training set learning should be uploaded to a unique group on Fritz. This would serve as a kind of 'version control' for this part of the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Scope code currently downloads and sums votes for each classification in a group of sources, but we do not yet have the code or strategy to grow the existing training set from that information. One potential strategy is:
One problem with the above strategy is that there is ambiguity about the reliability of classifications with a net vote sum of 0. Perhaps no labeler was sure about that classification, or an even number disagreed - should it be kept or not?
Perhaps each newly added portion of the training set learning should be uploaded to a unique group on Fritz. This would serve as a kind of 'version control' for this part of the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: