Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate a .csv trainingset from labels in Fritz #65

Closed
Tracked by #54
janvanroestel opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #54

Generate a .csv trainingset from labels in Fritz #65

janvanroestel opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@janvanroestel
Copy link
Collaborator

code is needed to take the classifications from Fritz, clean them, put them in the correct format and add the features

Feature Summary
The input are labels from Fritz, and the main (single) output should be a .csv file that is the same format as the D15 trainingset.

The code should

  • download objects and labels from Fritz
  • download and combine labels from multiple groups on Fritz
  • handle duplicate objects and labels
  • verify the upstream labels (e.g. a delta scuti should be variable and periodic)
  • get the features per lightcurves and join the with the labels
  • save everything as a .csv file (exactly the same format as d15). Add a header that specifies the code version, and time of download from Fritz
@janvanroestel janvanroestel added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 23, 2022
@janvanroestel janvanroestel self-assigned this Mar 23, 2022
@bfhealy bfhealy mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2022
48 tasks
@bfhealy
Copy link
Collaborator

bfhealy commented Oct 11, 2022

While we now have code that downloads sources from Fritz, merges features from Kowalksi, and saves the output, there are still some points in this issue that need addressing: verifying upstream labels, adding a header, and saved file format (csv or hdf5?)

@bfhealy
Copy link
Collaborator

bfhealy commented Oct 17, 2022

I am closing this issue and opening three new ones (#128, #129, #130) to separate the remaining action items.

@bfhealy bfhealy closed this as completed Oct 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants