You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I have a question on test set bias of the standard CNN model. After running cell #13 in Part2_Debiasing.ipynb, I see this histogram:
Am I correct in interpreting that avg test set accuracy is ~65% for Light Female, ~70% for Light Male, ~82% for Dark Female, and ~90% for Dark Male?
If training set has majority of data on light skinned female, I expected test set accuracy to be higher for that category. So, results of above hisogram are counter intuitive.
What am I missing?
--Rahul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah I'm getting unexpected results too, did you find an explanation @rvh72 ? Interestingly I'm not getting the same distribution as you, but I'm still seeing lowest probability (?) for Light Female.
Hello,
I have a question on test set bias of the standard CNN model. After running cell #13 in Part2_Debiasing.ipynb, I see this histogram:
Am I correct in interpreting that avg test set accuracy is ~65% for Light Female, ~70% for Light Male, ~82% for Dark Female, and ~90% for Dark Male?
If training set has majority of data on light skinned female, I expected test set accuracy to be higher for that category. So, results of above hisogram are counter intuitive.
What am I missing?
--Rahul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: