Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

read_bam shouldn't require BAM index #59

Open
shenker opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

read_bam shouldn't require BAM index #59

shenker opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@shenker
Copy link

shenker commented Jan 17, 2024

It would be great if read_bam worked without a BAM index (provided you're not doing a region query). My use case: Oxford Nanopore's Dorado basecaller outputs basecalled reads in BAM format (where all the alignment fields are null in the BAM), so I want to read them, but there's no point in indexing them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant