Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refusing to initialize GTK+ #3

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 21, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Refusing to initialize GTK+ #3

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 21, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I followed the installation instructions and everything was fine (except
for some 'sudo' i had to use here and there) until the "Testing if it
works" step.
I added the line to that file, but when i execute 'su [username]' my cam is
lighted up (has a light to tell when is being used) but i get this:

(process:20935): Gtk-WARNING **: This process is currently running setuid
or setgid.
This is not a supported use of GTK+. You must create a helper
program instead. For further details, see:

    http://www.gtk.org/setuid.html

Refusing to initialize GTK+.

i tried to know which process is that but there's none, only the 'su'
process which is the 20933 (for that error execution) and is taking both
cpu's to 100% and i have to kill it.

Using Kubuntu 8.10 and i used kubuntu's repos for downloading the needed
libs and stuff....

anyway, hope we can make this work, i'm really looking forward to this :)

regards,
Franco

Original issue reported on code.google.com by frap...@gmail.com on 6 Jan 2009 at 5:07

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hey Franco
I am working on fixing most of the bugs , next version is probably going to be 
out by
Jan 20th , which i will make sure that it is tested on all distro's.

Original comment by rohan.a...@gmail.com on 10 Jan 2009 at 10:51

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

hey
its Feb 26th , and the .3 version still in development, will be trying to 
release it
asap!

regards
Rohan

Original comment by rohan.a...@gmail.com on 26 Feb 2009 at 4:16

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This bug is fixed in version 0.3

Original comment by rohan.a...@gmail.com on 8 Jul 2010 at 10:51

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant