Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parallelize rubocop and normal tests for speed and clarity on what broke #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 4, 2016

Conversation

grosser
Copy link
Contributor

@grosser grosser commented May 1, 2016

@grosser
Copy link
Contributor Author

grosser commented May 1, 2016

screen shot 2016-05-01 at 10 38 23 am

@grosser
Copy link
Contributor Author

grosser commented May 1, 2016

(test errors are fixed with #165)

@grosser
Copy link
Contributor Author

grosser commented May 3, 2016

@abonas rebased this one ... should be green now

@abonas
Copy link
Member

abonas commented May 3, 2016

how much time does this save? the gem's tests shouldn't take too long to run in the first place.
cc @simon3z

@grosser
Copy link
Contributor Author

grosser commented May 3, 2016

takes it from 45s to 30s for ruby 2.0-2.2 ... but I think the main win is visibility, it's now obvious that rubocop failed and not the tests itself

@abonas
Copy link
Member

abonas commented May 4, 2016

I don't have any objections/concerns regarding this change.
@simon3z wdyt?

@simon3z
Copy link
Collaborator

simon3z commented May 4, 2016

I am definitely in favor of the .travis.yml file change.
On the other hand I don't think we need the complexity introduced in Rakefile (but don't block on me for this one).

@abonas
Copy link
Member

abonas commented May 4, 2016

@simon3z yes, I also had thoughts about the Rakefile.

@grosser
Copy link
Contributor Author

grosser commented May 4, 2016

updated Rakefile

@abonas abonas merged commit 93240d4 into ManageIQ:master May 4, 2016
@grosser grosser deleted the grosser/parallel branch May 24, 2016 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants