You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
short answer seems to be public perception and political will, sadly. measured in safety, ie harm to human life and the environment, nuclear power is one of the best energy sources, far above eg coal and natural gas, but it may always raise images of exotic danger and fear in the public at large, which is hard to fight.
technically, there seems to be good progress recently in breeder reactors, automation and safety, fully submerged and other water-managed operating modes, etc. cc @malcolmredheron for more depth. none of that really changes the public perception problem though.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: