WebHook System

[hikalkan]

No description provided.

[dicksonkimeu]

Hi @hikalkan this is urgent. For web based services this is a feature all of us need. We can prioritize?

[hikalkan]

Sorry, but "urgent" is not a word we like, especially for feature requests. If that's a requirement of your solution please implement it yourself. "normal" is a good priority level for this issue. We have more fundamental features/enhancements with higher priority. Thanks for your comment.

[xewn]

Asp.net core WebHooks

[albutta]

Still in the roadmap :)

[rei-okawara-portx]

Hi @hikalkan
Any plans to release this feature yet? I'm hopeful

[albutta]

@mattia is working on this module porting it from ABP Bolierplate
I am hopeful that he is able to share what he is doing, so that I can help or use what he has already done :)

[AhmadAlMunajjed]

Hi @albutta & @mattia, I'm quite curious to learn more about what you've been working on and how I might be able to assist or leverage what you've done so far.

[albutta]

I have not implemented webhooks into my application as yet.
I add webhook posts when requested.
As a workaround, I have a data table with a few fields, EntityName, EventName, BackgroundJobName and subscriber address. and API key.
When a entity is created or updated, a check is done for a subscriber for the entity and event, and then creates a background that posts the entity details to the subscriber. If a 200 is returned, the background job is closed, else a retry is done as per background priority.

This works for now, as I don't have that many.