-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement multitenancy on microservice demo #956
Comments
we have been waiting for this demo a long time. we need to make sure it works to start with abp |
it will work :) No problem on the infrastructure, but this is a complicated case. Need to test all possible flows and probably work on it a bit. |
To start new projects with this framework, I have to prove my boss that micro service and multi-tenant architecture are working flawlesly and unfortunately I don't have time to learn it, if it works this demo, I'll start without wasting time and start learning. I'm pretty sure a lot of people are waiting for this scenario:) Best Regards |
I can agree on that, but can not drop currently prioritized works and immediately start to work on that, sorry :( I you don't have time, I can't provide a solution in a very short time. |
actually we don't expect a demo instantly. just put things right order. we'll wait :) thanks |
I'm had some success doing this in my project, sorry I cant share the source code as its private. Maybe I can answer some questions. I'm not an expert in DotNet anymore, not programmed in it for 5 years plus, but I can share some insight |
i'm very sad right now:( postponed this feature to v0.21 |
Multenancy with microservice is complex. I don't say it is not important. It is hard and ABP will add a huge value on it. But we don't want to wait fundamental features and v1.0 release because of it. I hope this will be tested and stabilized before v1.0 release. If not, it will be a vert high priority issue after v1.0. |
Read ThreeMammals/Ocelot#1001 (comment) and was wondering if we might get multi-tenancy on the microservice demo by then :)? |
Hi all, I am not able to continue to work on this. We should wait for Ocelot to support asp.net core 3.0. I hope it will be available in the next week, before we release ABP v1.0. |
Will we get this soon now that ocelot supports asp.net core 3.0? |
ocelot supports asp.net core 3.0 |
@lockcd The abp microservices example has been upgraded ocelot 13.8.0 |
again it module move to next road map... hopefully done come in 1.2 roadmap |
I will work on this just after v1.1 release, but I didn't want to delay the v1.1 release of the framework because of a sample application. |
again it module move to next road map |
Yes, it moved again, sorry for it. But there was more significiant problems and you see that we needed to release an early 2.0 to fix the problems with some important changes. This is a free and open source project. If this is important for you, please consider to send a PR. It would be appreciated. |
I'm looking forward to this demo |
@pranavpatil19 I want to write before you: yes, it is moved again to the next milestone since we will release 2.1 tomorrow and didn't have time to work on this yet, sorry. |
No issue @hikalkan. Take your time . |
I am actively working on this on that branch: https://github.com/abpframework/abp/tree/ms-demo-multi-tenant Changing milestone to 2.3, but milestone has no meaning with this sample, since it is not something released. I will continue to work on. |
Why are you guys talking like that if it's an open source project? These things takes time and if you really need it, go ahead and do it by yourself, then submit a pull request with it. Anyway, thanks a lot @hikalkan for your work on it. It's a great framework that I'm really thinking to use in my project. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: