Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

White-list expected failures in tool checks #46

Closed
rudi opened this issue Aug 6, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

White-list expected failures in tool checks #46

rudi opened this issue Aug 6, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@rudi
Copy link
Member

rudi commented Aug 6, 2016


Author Name: Volker Stolz (Volker Stolz)
Original Redmine Issue: 123, https://envisage.ifi.uio.no:8080/redmine/issues/123
Original Date: 2014-01-29
Original Assignee: Volker Stolz


Right now, we run e.g. the deadlock checker on models where it doesn't actually make sense, like an open system or one without main block.

Can we capture these preconditions in the unit tests somehow, so that they do not show up as failed? I guess it will come up more frequently.

So either we return to individual tests, or we somehow add this to the parametrised test runner...

@rudi
Copy link
Member Author

rudi commented Aug 6, 2016


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Volker Stolz (Volker Stolz)
Original Date: 2014-02-10T11:55:50Z


Some tests now have preconditions, some more may be required.

Unfortunately, Bucky gets in the way: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/642964/
The views-count on my questions is already quite high, yet no answers.

@rudi
Copy link
Member Author

rudi commented Oct 22, 2018

we strive for no test failures and use Assume* in the tests as appropriate; closing

@rudi rudi closed this as completed Oct 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant