How to get the latest model name used in Official API?

[unique94]

I am just a little curious about the model name used in official api. Currently, the used one is engine="text-chat-davinci-002-20230126. How can we get the latest model? Thanks.

[acheong08]

That is the latest model leaked by the chat.openai.com website. We have not found evidence of additional models yet

[zhangj5]

Looks like this model is no longer available.

[kargaranamir]

no available anymore.

[0xdevalias]

See Also:

• Official vs Unofficial API #504
• [BUG] That model does not exit #515
• [BUG] openai.error.InvalidRequestError: That model does not exist #523
• [BUG] Official-- InvalidRequestError: That model does not exist #530

[acheong08]

Someone found the new model but is holding it hostage in exchange for people's API keys

[0xdevalias]

Someone found the new model

@acheong08 Do you have a source for that? My guess is they're probably just scamming people, and they haven't actually figured out the new model.

[acheong08]

https://github.com/PawanOsman/chatgpt-io

We're in the ChatGPT-Hacking discord

[acheong08]

Were arguing about the model till 3AM yesterday

[acheong08]

They benefited when @waylaidwanderer gave out the model name for free but now turned on us once he found the model

[0xdevalias]

That sucks :(

This sounds super scammy and will likely just steal anyones API tokens that uses it.. but here is the source anyway:

You can use this, this uses the new model founded
I do not share the model name to prevent OpenAI remove it soon

https://gist.github.com/PawanOsman/be803be44caed2449927860956b240ad

Originally posted by @PawanOsman in PawanOsman/ChatGPT-Official#1 (comment)

[acheong08]

I do not share the model name to prevent OpenAI remove it soon

That is pretty much a lie. The use of the model was given the green light by OpenAI devs to one of our discord community members. They simply update the model every week but we lost access to the info leak that allowed us to get the model name.

[acheong08]

The dude just wants people to use his API

[0xdevalias]

The use of the model was given the green light by OpenAI devs to one of our discord community members. They simply update the model every week but we lost access to the info leak that allowed us to get the model name.

@acheong08 If the OpenAI devs gave the green light to be able to use it, could you not just ask them for the updated model name?

[acheong08]

If the OpenAI devs gave the green light to be able to use it, could you not just ask them for the updated model name?

It wasn't to me but someone else.

[acheong08]

I'm not part of their private group

[acheong08]

Closing in favor of unified thread

[PawanOsman]

I do not share the model name to prevent OpenAI remove it soon

That is pretty much a lie. The use of the model was given the green light by OpenAI devs to one of our discord community members. They simply update the model every week but we lost access to the info leak that allowed us to get the model name.

then you can ask them for the model name 😁 its so stupid to say they let peoples use leaked model names while they have paid service and they have so much limitations on the original ChatGPT

[waylaidwanderer]

its so stupid to say they let peoples use leaked model names while they have paid service

Just writing a counterpoint to this part of your message only, and nothing else, to show that OpenAI has already set a precedence for doing this:
Codex models are currently free to use via the API, even though Copilot requires a subscription to use.

I'm not trying to argue any of your other points, just this singular one. In both cases, it's a raw model vs. a user-friendly interface using the model.

[PawanOsman]

@waylaidwanderer then can you tell me why they removed the old model name while they created the same model with a new name?

Its better to say why they renamed the model if they okay with that?

[PawanOsman]

They benefited when @waylaidwanderer gave out the model name for free but now turned on us once he found the model

Ha ha ha, i told you before that i already found the model before everyone, but i didn't know how to use thats why he deserves to take the credit

I know how i founded, and if they change again i can find it again

[waylaidwanderer]

then can you tell me why they removed the old model name while they created the same model with a new name?

How do you know it's not a newer model? That's not something you can really prove without us knowing the model name and testing it ourselves.

[acheong08]

Ha ha ha, i told you before that i already found the model before everyone, but i didn't know how to use thats why he deserves to take the credit

No actual proof

[PawanOsman]

Ha ha ha, i told you before that i already found the model before everyone, but i didn't know how to use thats why he deserves to take the credit

No actual proof

Ofc if i had a single way to proof i would not let anyone take the credit 😅

[PawanOsman]

then can you tell me why they removed the old model name while they created the same model with a new name?

How do you know it's not a newer model? That's not something you can really prove without us knowing the model name and testing it ourselves.

Newer model must have a newer date not still same date

It's definitely to prevent us from using it

[acheong08]

Newer model must have a newer date not still same date
It's definitely to prevent us from using it

Are you saying it still has the same date and just different name?

(Of course you wouldn't answer)

[PawanOsman]

Newer model must have a newer date not still same date
It's definitely to prevent us from using it

Are you saying it still has the same date and just different name?

(Of course you wouldn't answer)

I already said that in discord
Yeah the new model has the same date with a new name,
its looks like just renamed not removed

[0xdevalias]

Are you saying it still has the same date and just different name?

I already said that in discord Yeah the new model has the same date with a new name, its looks like just renamed not removed

I've just been playing around with updating some of my scripts/research/etc in my PoC ChatGPT repo this morning:

• https://github.com/0xdevalias/poc-chatgpt
  • https://github.com/0xdevalias/poc-chatgpt/commits/main

And if you look at this commit, you can see that when I extracted/sorted the output of /v1/models by created date, there is one at the top which curiously seems to share a date (20230126) with the original leaked model (text-chat-davinci-002-20230126):

2023-01-26T23:36:25Z audio-transcribe-deprecated

Though if I try and use it with the completions API, I get an error:

⇒ curl https://api.openai.com/v1/completions -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" -d '{
  "model": "audio-transcribe-deprecated",
  "prompt": "Say this is a test",
  "max_tokens": 7,
  "temperature": 0
}'

{
  "error": {
    "message": "The server had an error processing your request. Sorry about that! You can retry your request, or contact support@openai.com if you keep seeing this error. (Please include the request ID 316fc3215fa0a3278824c35138d3665a in your email.)",
    "type": "server_error",
    "param": null,
    "code": null
  }
}

Could be a coincidence.. but figured I would include the info here in case it's helpful to anyone.

[acheong08]

The error implies that the input data is not supposed to be text but audio. I would say it's a coincidence. The text-chat-davinci-002-xxxxxxx models never shows up on the models API endpoint anyways