Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mini model test #71

Closed
bstabler opened this issue Apr 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

mini model test #71

bstabler opened this issue Apr 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor

bstabler commented Apr 7, 2016

The current example and tests use only the distance skim for all skim data and also runs only selective purposes, modes, and other expressions. This was likely done in part to be fast and to make use of free online Travis CI integration. In order to continue to flush out the implementation, we'd like to create a mini model test, with say 20 zones, so we can always be working with a more comprehensive test bed. We did this for the Oregon statewide integrated model and it proved to be extremely useful. We'll need to select 20 zones that have good coverage for the various input data - land use, mode availability, etc. We'll also create a script to automatically create the mini model inputs from the full set of inputs. What do others think about this?

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DavidOry suggested a zone 1-190 (SF county) test. The group agreed to give this a try.

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@toliwaga to test once the full set of skims revisions are in place. I tested these on the current limited example and they worked fine.

@toliwaga
Copy link
Contributor

This is all working fine on the large-scale-test branch. Tidying things up to merge into master...

@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor Author

We also created a 25 zone version for the Travis testing and plan to use this as the example and main test moving forward.

bstabler added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2016
@danielsclint danielsclint added this to the Phase 2: Skim Handling milestone Jun 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants