You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current example and tests use only the distance skim for all skim data and also runs only selective purposes, modes, and other expressions. This was likely done in part to be fast and to make use of free online Travis CI integration. In order to continue to flush out the implementation, we'd like to create a mini model test, with say 20 zones, so we can always be working with a more comprehensive test bed. We did this for the Oregon statewide integrated model and it proved to be extremely useful. We'll need to select 20 zones that have good coverage for the various input data - land use, mode availability, etc. We'll also create a script to automatically create the mini model inputs from the full set of inputs. What do others think about this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current example and tests use only the distance skim for all skim data and also runs only selective purposes, modes, and other expressions. This was likely done in part to be fast and to make use of free online Travis CI integration. In order to continue to flush out the implementation, we'd like to create a mini model test, with say 20 zones, so we can always be working with a more comprehensive test bed. We did this for the Oregon statewide integrated model and it proved to be extremely useful. We'll need to select 20 zones that have good coverage for the various input data - land use, mode availability, etc. We'll also create a script to automatically create the mini model inputs from the full set of inputs. What do others think about this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: