Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Make the DigitizationConfigurator usable #921

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 23, 2021

Conversation

paulgessinger
Copy link
Member

This was previously only privately used in the
DigitizationConfigExample, but can be useful in other context.
At the same time, this introduces a constructor for DigitizationConfig
that only takes a finished geometry hierachy map (and no program options), which can for instance
be built with the configurator.

This was previously only privately used in the
DigitizationConfigExample, but can be useful in other context.
At the same time, this introduces a constructor for `DigitizationConfig`
that only takes a finished geometry hierachy map (and no program options), which can for instance
be built with the configurator.
@paulgessinger paulgessinger added this to the next milestone Aug 4, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #921 (2586870) into main (d04706b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #921   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.63%   48.63%           
=======================================
  Files         334      334           
  Lines       17149    17149           
  Branches     8086     8086           
=======================================
  Hits         8340     8340           
  Misses       3091     3091           
  Partials     5718     5718           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d04706b...2586870. Read the comment docs.

@gagnonlg
Copy link
Contributor

gagnonlg commented Aug 19, 2021

Looks good to me! Some of the CI jobs seem to be failing but for spurious reasons, anyways we'll see how they do once the branch is rebased.

@paulgessinger paulgessinger merged commit 6521c13 into acts-project:main Aug 23, 2021
@paulgessinger paulgessinger deleted the py/digicfg branch August 23, 2021 07:04
@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: next, v12.0.0 Aug 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants