You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running the example query "Cities in Germany population latest" (see below) on http://qlever.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/Clueweb+Freebase yields a strange result. It seems to suggest that the population of the first 73 cities is identical with the value of 7124543962.
PREFIX fb: <http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/>
SELECT ?city_name ?latest ?population_value WHERE {
{
SELECT ?city (MAX(?date) as ?latest) WHERE {
?city fb:type.object.type fb:location.citytown .
?city fb:location.location.containedby fb:m.0345h .
?city fb:location.statistical_region.population ?population .
?population fb:measurement_unit.dated_integer.year ?date .
}
GROUP BY ?city
}
?population fb:measurement_unit.dated_integer.year ?latest .
?population fb:measurement_unit.dated_integer.number ?population_value .
?city fb:type.object.name ?city_name .
}
ORDER BY DESC(?population_value)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Running the example query "Cities in Germany population latest" (see below) on
http://qlever.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/Clueweb+Freebase
yields a strange result. It seems to suggest that the population of the first 73 cities is identical with the value of 7124543962.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: