Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update uri #36

Open
creighton opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Update uri #36

creighton opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@creighton
Copy link
Contributor

need to update this to : https://w3id.org/xapi/adl

     "category": [
        {
           "id": "https://w3id.org/xapi/adl/profiles/scorm"
        }
@creighton
Copy link
Contributor Author

creighton commented Mar 29, 2016

@creighton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@creighton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jhaag75
Copy link
Contributor

jhaag75 commented Jun 16, 2016

The context category IRI is fine:

     "category": [
        {
           "id": "https://w3id.org/xapi/adl/profiles/scorm"
        }

The rewrite rules account for that level of depth now. For example, open up a terminal window and use curl to do a get on the IRI:

curl --header "Accept: application/json" -L htts://w3id.org/xapi/adl/profiles/scorm

or

curl --header "Accept: application/ld+json" -L htts://w3id.org/xapi/adl/profiles/scorm

It returns the JSON metadata for either a JSON or JSON-LD request.

However, do we want to only return the ADL verbs and activity types? Because that is all that is returned. Or do you want to return SCORM profile specific information? I think we need to return the SCORM profile RDF you created instead. We will need to update the rewrite rules for /profiles/scorm too.

@jhaag75 jhaag75 reopened this Jun 16, 2016
@jhaag75
Copy link
Contributor

jhaag75 commented Jun 16, 2016

After second thought we should update this to https://w3id.org/xapi/scorm

Now that I've read the other documents more carefully I think we should change this to simplify things and stay consistent with the recommended IRI naming convention and rewrite rules in place for future automation (hopefully).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants