Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify exactly which properties the LRS MUST (or SHOULD) omit when responding to a GET Statements request with format=ids #1022

Open
garemoko opened this issue Jan 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@garemoko
Copy link
Contributor

See adlnet-archive/grail-issue-tracker#61 (comment)

I'm suggesting that the following is what's required of the LRS, mainly because this is what Watershed does today and it seems reasonable to me.

  • For agents the name property is omitted
  • For verbs the display property is omitted
  • For activities the definition property is omitted.

The point of contention is whether or not the LRS MUST omit the objectType property when the actor contains an agent (not a group). I'd argue that the LRS SHOULD NOT but MAY.

@andyjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

Per the 1/18/17 call, come up with a list of what is not allowed and replace the vague text in Communication.md.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants