You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the implementation! I was curious as to why you have both mask and mask_bc under miscelanea.py -> function def test_mie_ll as dataset[:][2]. Shouldn't the mask_bc = dataset[:][1] ? i.e., we need to be applying the mask when encoding and then generate the data. dataset[:][2] refers to the variable nan_mask (in file datasets.py) which is essentially all ones. It will be great if you can clarify this.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @VRM1. You are completely right, we should feed the observed mask dataset[:][1] to the model, and then use the missing mask to compute the missing imputation error and likelihood.
This is fixed in my follow-up repository for another project, but somehow I forgot to update this repository.
Thanks for the implementation! I was curious as to why you have both mask and mask_bc under
miscelanea.py -> function def test_mie_ll
asdataset[:][2]
. Shouldn't themask_bc = dataset[:][1]
? i.e., we need to be applying the mask when encoding and then generate the data.dataset[:][2]
refers to the variablenan_mask
(in file datasets.py) which is essentially all ones. It will be great if you can clarify this.Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: