Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proper Documentation request for Multitenancy feature #91

Closed
vedraiyani opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Proper Documentation request for Multitenancy feature #91

vedraiyani opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@vedraiyani
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I followed the doc for multitenancy where it's mentioned to set up the config but nothing is said about how we can configure the tenant for the store. I could also see that Multi-tenant 1 is mentioned so how to configure db for each tenant?

@adrien2p
Copy link
Owner

adrien2p commented May 20, 2022

Yes, you are right. I will improve that as well as the way it work. At the moment, you have to put the different db creds into the database in the multi tenant table. But they are registered in clear. Asap i will move that to be fully in the config so that way you can hide the creds in the env instead.

@adrien2p
Copy link
Owner

#93 will change the way the module work, the documentation update will be part of it. Everything will be part of the next release 👍

@adrien2p
Copy link
Owner

@vedraiyani just wanted to know a bit more about the usage for the multi tenancy that you are looking for. Could you tell me a bit more about your use case before merging the branch and updating the doc.

At the moment, you have the capabilities of different multi tenancy approach with the extender.

1 similar comment
@adrien2p
Copy link
Owner

@vedraiyani just wanted to know a bit more about the usage for the multi tenancy that you are looking for. Could you tell me a bit more about your use case before merging the branch and updating the doc.

At the moment, you have the capabilities of different multi tenancy approach with the extender.

@vedraiyani
Copy link
Author

@adrien2p I was thinking of providing multiple tenants(e.g. test, production,...) of the same customer under the same server or may be multiple stores under the same server

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants