Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redistribution of GPL-ed binaries linked with OpenSSL is not permitted #10

Closed
lkundrak opened this issue Sep 24, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@lkundrak
Copy link
Collaborator

There's a well known clash between the licenses (OpenSSL adds an "additional restriction" which is specifically not allowed by GPL). Therefore the license doesn't allow anyone to redistribute the resulting binaries (since a e.g. a Linux distro shipping both is technically a derived work of the package).

I'd be very thankful if this could be solved and I could distribute the code in Fedora. One obvious solution would be to port it to some other library that does encryption; be it NSS or GNU TLS. Another solution is to add an exception to the openfortivpn license which would allow it to be linked with OpenSSL. I'd prefer the latter as the former takes some non-trivial effort.

See this document for analysis; the possible solutions and links to examples how it has been dealt with:
https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html

Thank you
Lubo

@adrienverge
Copy link
Owner

Lubomir, first, thank you for your recent contributions to this project and for your informed advice.

I wasn't aware of that clash. I'll do a pull request to solve this issue. Fell free to review.

@lkundrak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants