You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In your paper, you write that: Naive supervised losses require the generator to reconstruct
the ground truth precisely. However, the visible parts of the
image often do not contain enough information for the exact
reconstruction of the masked part. Therefore, using naive
supervision leads to blurry results due to the averaging of
multiple plausible modes of the inpainted content.
In contrast, perceptual loss evaluates a distance between features extracted from the predicted and the target
images by a base pre-trained network
But inside some main configs, you set the perceptual weight to 0.
Is it a config problem, or do you train the models without perceptual loss?
perceptual:
weight: 0
In lama-fourier config
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In your paper, you write that:
Naive supervised losses require the generator to reconstruct
the ground truth precisely. However, the visible parts of the
image often do not contain enough information for the exact
reconstruction of the masked part. Therefore, using naive
supervision leads to blurry results due to the averaging of
multiple plausible modes of the inpainted content.
In contrast, perceptual loss evaluates a distance between features extracted from the predicted and the target
images by a base pre-trained network
But inside some main configs, you set the perceptual weight to 0.
Is it a config problem, or do you train the models without perceptual loss?
In
lama-fourier
configThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: