Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

AEROGEAR-8193 - initial batch of integration tests #17

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2018

Conversation

aliok
Copy link
Member

@aliok aliok commented Dec 12, 2018

3 kind of integration tests:

@darahayes ready for review!

@aliok aliok changed the title AEROGEAR-8193 - initial batch of integration tests [WIP] AEROGEAR-8193 - initial batch of integration tests Dec 12, 2018
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
/* Basic Options */
"target": "ES2017", /* Specify ECMAScript target version: 'ES3' (default), 'ES5', 'ES2015', 'ES2016', 'ES2017','ES2018' or 'ESNEXT'. */
"module": "commonjs", /* Specify module code generation: 'none', 'commonjs', 'amd', 'system', 'umd', 'es2015', or 'ESNext'. */
"lib": ["es2017", "esnext.asynciterable"], /* Specify library files to be included in the compilation. */
"lib": ["es2017", "esnext.asynciterable", "dom"], /* Specify library files to be included in the compilation. */
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aliok aliok changed the title [WIP] AEROGEAR-8193 - initial batch of integration tests AEROGEAR-8193 - initial batch of integration tests Dec 12, 2018
@aliok
Copy link
Member Author

aliok commented Dec 13, 2018

@darahayes ready for review and verification

Copy link
Contributor

@darahayes darahayes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great Work @aliok! We might have to consider running integration tests separately like we did previously. But I think it's perfect for now! :)

@aliok aliok merged commit f883ac0 into master Dec 13, 2018
@aliok aliok deleted the AEROGEAR-8193-integration-tests branch December 13, 2018 11:00
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants