Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for batchRead or batchGet #88

Closed
abhilashg1 opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for batchRead or batchGet #88

abhilashg1 opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@abhilashg1
Copy link

I don't see the support for batchRead or batchGet in the https://www.aerospike.com/apidocs/rust/aerospike/index.html?search=batch. Either the docs are not updated or something is off, we cannot map one to one correlation with github codes and API docs.

@jonas32
Copy link
Contributor

jonas32 commented Oct 8, 2020

The docs are updated, but its a little tricky to find. Here you go:
https://docs.rs/aerospike/0.6.0/aerospike/struct.Client.html#method.batch_get
For a better implementation example, check this:
https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-client-rust/blob/master/tests/src/batch.rs

But as i said, its a little tricky. Maybe we should try to improve the docs.

@jhecking
Copy link
Contributor

jhecking commented Oct 8, 2020

The docs at https://docs.rs/aerospike/ are the most up-to-date. Those API docs are also linked from https://www.aerospike.com/docs/client/rust/. I'm not sure when or how the docs at www.aerospike/apidocs/rust were generated, but they are very out of date. I will try to replace them with a reference to the docs at docs.rs instead.

@jhecking
Copy link
Contributor

jhecking commented Oct 9, 2020

I will try to replace them with a reference to the docs at docs.rs instead.

This is done. www.aerospike.com/apidocs/rust/ now redirects to the docs at docs.rs instead.

@abhilashg1 I'm going to close this issue. Feel free to re-open or file another issue if you still have problems getting batch commands to work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants