Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about parameter files #3

Closed
samsrabin opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Questions about parameter files #3

samsrabin opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@samsrabin
Copy link
Member

(@minoli-pik Tagging you as requested, to ensure you see this.)

crop_parameters.csv

  1. These are these parameters that should be shared for all crop models, right?
  2. Not every GGCMI crop is represented here. Does that mean that some crops, like pea, can't have outputs produced?
  3. maturity_to_harvest and max_flowering_phase appear to be unused; is that correct?

lpjml_crop_parameters_ggcmi_ph3.csv

  1. These are parameters that should be customized for each crop model, right?
  2. photosens, basetemp2, basephoto, and fphu.ant appear to be unused; is that correct?
@minoli-pik
Copy link
Member

Hi @samsrabin,

crop_parameters.csv

You are right:

  1. crop_parameters.csv includes the parameters for the crop calendar calculation, which is not crop-model specific.
  2. the crop-calendar model has been developed for
    a. grain crops only (i.e. root crops, like sugar beet can't be handled with the rules as they are currently)
    b. crops for which parameters have been found in literature. Yet, it could be eventually be extended to simulate other grain crops, such as pea. However for these crops, in the GGCMI calls we had decided to use the observation-based crop calendars and adapt only the cultivar (i.e. PHU), like we did in GGCMI phase 2 with the A1 adaptation scenario.
  3. Correct, maturity_to_harvest and max_flowering_phase are not used for calculating crop calendars. maturity_to_harvest is, in principle, needed to evaluate the crop calendar results. In fact, the model simulates maturity dates, while observation based datasets report harvest dates. Therefore, if you want to compare the simulated with the observed harvest dates, you need to first add maturity_to_harvest to simulated maturity dates. Yet, maturity_to_harvest is very much approximate and values were taken from Elliott et al., 2015.

lpjml_crop_parameters_ggcmi_ph3.csv

  1. Right!
  2. Yes, in LPJmL simulations photoperiod responses are not considered, although parameters exist for that (photosens, basephoto). basetemp2 and fphu.ant are not used for GGCMI simulations, and are rather left-overs from other approaches/projects.

@samsrabin
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, that all makes sense. Thanks! I'll close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants