Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Duplicate ids #27

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
bibo38 opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks

Duplicate ids #27

bibo38 opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@bibo38
Copy link
Contributor

bibo38 commented Jun 29, 2017

I have just searched this repository for duplicate IDs and found the following:

  • coffee_plant
  • rice_plant
  • barley_plant
  • cotton_plant
  • beet_plant
  • farmland_soil

Instead of just renaming every plant, I would suggest a namespace feature.
Example usage may be:

  • When referencing a plant, we just use the current folder as the namespace. E.g. Referencing beet_plant in the vanilla folder leads to the search for "vanilla:beet_plant"
  • Referencing from other mods may be like "harvestcraft:beet_plant" or "vanilla:beet_plant"
@RlonRyan
Copy link
Member

RlonRyan commented Jul 4, 2017

Yeah... I really should add domains to the loader.

bibo38 added a commit to bibo38/AgriPlants that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2017
A exact duplicate of the farmland soil from vanilla minecraft is present in the
mystical_agricultures mod directory. This causes a duplicate id like
described in AgriCraft#27.
@TokkenGmr
Copy link
Contributor

A PR has been made that removes the extra farmland_soil JSON. As well as a change to the vanilla beet JSON that will eliminate those duplicates

RlonRyan pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2018
A exact duplicate of the farmland soil from vanilla minecraft is present in the
mystical_agricultures mod directory. This causes a duplicate id like
described in #27.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants