-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem with Lexvo recommended URIs for natural language property #507
Comments
Maybe check: https://glottolog.org/glottolog/language |
Other possibles URIs are from the LOC e.g., http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-1/pt |
@jonquet you should read this https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19288173/is-there-a-free-available-document-with-most-iso-639-languages-codes
|
Interesting catch. Indeed this a good explanation of the explanation of how the tag is built... |
I propose we relax the rule in the back end of having a URI mandatory for the
@syphax-bouazzouni This is open to discussion to see if we do implement it in a way that will avoid us to come back to the code each time we need to add a "subtag"... still being sure that languages do not endup messy.. For instance, we could allow the proposition of language in ISO-639-3 codes (3 letters) and subtags (2letter-2letter)... |
It seems LEXVO does not dully support ISO-639-1
For exemple, they don't support Brazilian Portuguese
Portuguese URI
http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/pt
Brazilian Portuguese
http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/pt-br
Based on https://www.andiamo.co.uk/resources/iso-language-codes/ these codes are in ISO-639-1
I was confused with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639_language_codes thinking this was complete but in fact not.
We will need to switch to another set if URIs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: