undefined method A1 for #<Soroban::Sheet:0x007f844c9ffb28>

[thirdreplicator]

s.A1 is throwing an error. Am I doing something wrong? Thank you.

$ irb

1.9.3p392 :001 > require 'soroban'
=> true

1.9.3p392 :002 > s = Soroban::Sheet.new()
=> #<Soroban::Sheet:0x007f844c9ffb28 @logger=nil, @cells={}, @changes={}, @bindings={}>

1.9.3p392 :003 > s.A1
NoMethodError: undefined method A1' for #<Soroban::Sheet:0x007f844c9ffb28> from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:29:inmethod_missing'
from (irb):3
from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p392/bin/irb:16:in `

'

1.9.3p392 :004 > s.A1=2
NameError: uninitialized constant Soroban::Sheet::Set
from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:17:in block in initialize' from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:144:inyield'
from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:144:in default' from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:144:in_clear'
from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:140:in _set' from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:129:in_add'
from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p392/gems/soroban-0.5.4/lib/soroban/sheet.rb:27:in method_missing' from (irb):4 from /Users/thirdreplicator/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p392/bin/irb:16:in

'

[kranzky]

Sorry you hit a problem using Soroban @thirdreplicator :(

You can work-around this problem by doing require 'set' prior to requiring Soroban. Alternatively, we've fixed this issue in 0.7.2, so you can update to that and all should be good. Thanks for reporting the issue (we missed it because we use Bundler, and it seems that requires Set and therefore hides this missing dependency).

[kranzky]

Huh, I see @atlantageek fixed this a week ago in his fork; PR next time please ;)

[atlantageek]

OK. youre really my first fork. I didnt realize that was the protocol. Do you plan to implement the to_javascript method in the near future?

[kranzky]

No worries @atlantageek; was just nice to see you'd made the fix. But yes, if you'd issues a pull request I would have accepted it gratefully.

At the moment I personally would love to implement to_javascript, but there's no pressing need to do that at the moment to support what we're using Soroban for, so other work is coming first I'm afraid.