Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of debug is breaking the build 🚨 #30

Closed
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Dec 21, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

An in-range update of debug is breaking the build 🚨 #30

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Dec 21, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 21, 2016

Version 2.5.0 of debug just got published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency debug
Current Version 2.4.5
Type dependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As debug is a direct dependency of this project this is very likely breaking your project right now. If other packages depend on you it’s very likely also breaking them.
I recommend you give this issue a very high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪


Status Details
  • dependency-ci Dependencies checked Details

  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build failed Details

Commits

The new version differs by 26 commits .

  • 355e327 release 2.5.0
  • d85c0c6 build perf, fix for bowerfile, fix for webworker
  • dc043cf Merge pull request #378 from yamikuronue/replace-babel-with-browserify
  • f512cf2 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into replace-babel-with-browserify
  • f098331 Merge pull request #388 from ForsakenHarmony/patch-1
  • a16cf42 Merge pull request #387 from kribblo/patch-1
  • 78e31a8 Update browser.js
  • 408ae94 Use typeof window.process !== 'undefined'
  • f484cfe fix merge errors
  • 23af483 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into replace-babel-with-browserify
  • 3e1a15d fix: merged again, because it didn't take. Guess I did it wrong?
  • 67182fd fix: Whoops, didn't merge the tests properly. Resolved.
  • 2a01c6c Merged from upstream/master. I left the dist/debug in place because my hook now updates it automatically, but I removed the babelrc file since we don't need it anymore.
  • 6e934e9 Fix for #381. Moved .babelrc into test folder, where it is used and which is not built with the module. (#383)
  • 6a8d525 chore: add coveralls

There are 26 commits in total. See the full diff.

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 21, 2016

After pinning to 2.4.5 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 21, 2016

Version 2.5.1 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 5 commits .

See the full diff.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 26, 2016

Version 2.5.2 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 5 commits .

  • 9a18d66 release 2.5.2
  • eba68ce fix(browser): prevent ReferenceError in workers (#393)
  • 280a64d Merge pull request #391 from lurch/patch-1
  • 146d0d1 Fix README typo
  • ea43614 added notice about v3 api discussion

See the full diff.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 29, 2016

Version 2.6.0 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits .

  • ac5ccae release 2.6.0
  • 5895595 better null pointer checks for browser useColors
  • 6646130 remove explicit window.debug export (#404)
  • 62df220 Deprecate DEBUG_FD (#405)

See the full diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant