We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Semi-automatic selection of primary studies in systematic literature reviews: is it reasonable? (2015): Score Citation Automatic Selection (SCAS), to automate part of the primary study selection activity. (58.2 % cost reduction, 12.98 % error rate.)
VTM 2013, VTM 2011. (Clustering, citation maps), less than half cost reduction (70.14 min -> 54.5 min).
A visual analysis approach to update systematic reviews 2014
Formalizing a systematic review updating process first addressed the difficulty of updating an SLR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
good u found these
what is your comment of your work w.r.t. the above?
Sorry, something went wrong.
I am writing the second paper. Adding this into the background.
My work is from a different perspective. Our works about update may be able to combine.
No branches or pull requests
Semi-automatic selection of primary studies in systematic literature reviews: is it reasonable? (2015): Score Citation Automatic Selection (SCAS), to automate part of the primary study selection activity. (58.2 % cost reduction, 12.98 % error rate.)
VTM 2013, VTM 2011. (Clustering, citation maps), less than half cost reduction (70.14 min -> 54.5 min).
UPDATE
A visual analysis approach to update systematic reviews 2014
Formalizing a systematic review updating process first addressed the difficulty of updating an SLR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: