New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EnergyNetwork malfunction #2474
Comments
Had exactly the same issue when extracting power from Thermal Expansion energy cells. Replacing (ultimate) cables helped temporarily. Funnily, the bug later reappeared in the same spot. This reminds me of faulty TE power conduits issue... Forge 10.13.2.1291
|
@OldEnt GitHub doesn't use BBCode.
That will result in
|
Probably related to build 202 no. 21 change ( issue 07d0c2b )? http://ci.indiewikis.com:8080/job/Mekanism/changes As stated above I got 215 build. |
May be fixed with the new network overhaul. Those with dev server access, mind doing testing on this issue? |
Just updated mods and unfortunately, I must confirm that the cables are draining power and not transferring it. EDIT |
@aidancbrady It's still bugged. More than before. Now cables with nothing connected to them is draining my energy cube even when i make a new network. Running version 8.1.1.218 |
What are they saying if you network reader them? |
Basically that there is energy buffered. But when the energy cube empties there is no buffer anymore, (0 J) |
Seems to be random, when i place it somewhere it seems to work. But old networks are still bugged. Is there possible that there is invisible bugged ghost networks that the new places ones is "connected" to? |
I'll try something, let me know if the next build fixes this. |
@unpairedbracket It's not negative when using the network reader. Obviously since you added a check for that. But not sure if this solves the drain issue, need to do some more testing :) But good job so far, thanks :) |
@unpairedbracket Instead of buffer being negative it's now being 0 J no matter how much energy it drains from my storage. |
That's... Odd. I can't reproduce in testing - what kinds of storage are you using here? Pure Mekanism, or is there IC2 or RF mixed in there too? |
It's saying:
Is this accurate; are there 13 non-cable things connected to the network? If so what are they? |
Hmm, so it's an issue with the acceptor system. Do you happen to have any other mods installed that ship the Mekanism API (Likely candidates EnderIO and Galacticraft)? If so, can you remove the "mekanism" folders from their jars, and let me know what happens? |
Mh, yeah we have EnderIO. I dont know which other mods ships the Mekanism API. Have to check all 164 :D |
If you send the world files to me (link on Dropbox or Drive or something), and give me the coordinates of an affected network I'll take a look at it? |
you would need the whole modpack and the map is about 2gigabytes?! :D |
Ok, that might not work. I was looking to test with only Mekanism installed, to work out whether it's an interaction or not. If you have enough disk space to back up the world, you could try doing that yourself - back up the world, then load it up with only Mekanism and try the network reader again? If not there's not much else I can suggest to help. |
EnderIO is the only mod that ships the Mekanism API in our Modpack. Removed the folder. Nothing changed. |
Well, I'm out of ideas on this issue then. @halvors, are you experiencing the same behaviour, or is the issue you're having different in any way? |
Will perform a backup, delete all mods except Mekanism and Biomes O'Plenty (for the biomes) and take a look at it. |
@unpairedbracket Think it's the same issue. Seems also that "pre" Mekanism 8, cables are the ones causing trouble, and maybe new cables placed where the pre Mekanism 8 used to be too. I'm only using energy cubes and induction matrixes in the setup i'm using, i have not enderio installed. |
@halvors @unpairedbracket can't be some v8 related stuff. We had no problems with 8.0.3 cables (except of client crashes that aidan fixed in 217) |
No Problems with only Mekanism. That is really strange! Nothing is connected with all mods to the Mekanism-Network but some invisible things seems to dump all the energy. And recognize: This only happens to old networks before the rewrite of it. @halvors can you post a list of your mods? @unpairedbracket http://www.technicpack.net/modpack/zockercraft.609172/mods take a look at the list. Maybe you know what Mekanism recognizes as an acceptor. |
Replaced the Whole Network. And what happend? Once I connect something to it: Same Problem again. to clarify: I attached the Induction Matrix to the Cable - before I did it, all was fine with the cables: They stored the energy and didn't dumped it into nothing. After it, the Buffer of the Network got pumped into the induction matrix and then the energy that got into the network just got dumped! This can't be a problem outside of Mekanism. |
And that's with only Mekanism installed? |
No. Thats with the Modpack. But it's strange, that it's only happen when I connect Mekanism-Things to it. The Cables itselfs are working fine without acceptors. |
@unpairedbracket It just drained a 5 TJ induction matrix... It's kindof unplayable... |
@unpairedbracket Thus bug must have been introduced sometime after the first v8 release and somehow gotten into your energy network rewrite? |
@unpairedbracket On our production server we use Mekanism with Applied Energistics, is Mekanism integrating AE energy units or is Applied Energistics integrating Mekanism? |
Performed a WHOLE! modpack update. Nothing changed. Mekanism Network only have problems with the energy matrix. |
Ive reverted back to 8.0.2. No issues with that version. |
We had a servercrash now... lulz.
|
I've reproduced the issue. It was a RF interaction. I will now attempt to fix the issue. |
Try build 223, it should fix both the draining and that crash you just reported. |
@unpairedbracket You think this is why Applied Energistics was draining a lot of more power than before too? Couple of MJ's per second. |
Not sure on that one - I'm not entirely sure why it would be happening |
@unpairedbracket Also see you updated the Forge version required, any reason why? I pretty sure i'm unable to update to 223 now because of this fluid change, 1365 is not a recommended build as far as i know. Why did you choose to go for that? |
Oh, whoops. Hadn't taken into account it wouldn't work with earlier forge. I will revert that change when I have the chance |
@unpairedbracket Think there will be a recommended release pretty soon that includes the new fluid system. Maybe just create a branch for that in the meanwhile so that you don't need to redo it later 👍 |
Yeah, that sounds like a good plan. Out of interest, are there still incompatibilities between other mods and 1365 that prevent you from updating, or do you just prefer to stick to recommended builds? |
It's a lot of other mods that does not have a build for 1355+. Probatly because that is not a recommended build. |
@unpairedbracket Will this be reverted soon so that i could test the solved RF issues? |
Soon yes, but it's currently 2am and I'm packing to go back to university tomorrow so it may be a little while. |
Just wanted to say thank you for your hard work on this. Have a good night. |
Let me talk to you as a modpack creator and administrator. As of now all our 150+ mods are working with forge 1366. Why I considered updating? @unpairedbracket thanks for your hard work at this. Will test the new build tomorrow. :) |
There, back to 1291. Build 224 should work with Forge pre-fluid breakage. And @NitroxydeX, I'm just moving back in tomorrow - lectures don't start for another 2 weeks but we are going to be tested before that... |
Can confirm: 223 and 224 cables working fine. |
Indeed it seems like that. Seems the RF bug was the issue that caused the AE2 controller to drain so much power as well. |
@halvors was not the controller that drained it. the cables just not delivered the power. |
@NitroxydeX Are you sure? Oh due to the RF issue? |
@halvors yes. |
I'm expriencing that some EnergyNetworks seems to be malfunctioning.
They just drain all the energy available and if you see the video it seems that the "Needed" value is negative even when there is no devices connected to it.
Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAEXbMn076c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: