Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

simulation mode #28

Closed
Zugschlus opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

simulation mode #28

Zugschlus opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@Zugschlus
Copy link

This is a summary of https://sourceforge.net/p/aide/feature-requests/1/ and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289174

Hi,

even if i have some background in regular expressions
it's in some cases not clear to me what happens and why
some directories are added and others not.

What i miss is a kind of simulation mode where i can
see which directories or files will be added. Its very
hard if you have to wait for the result after a small
change in the config file. Also it's very hard to check
the database file whether a directory was added or not.
With this simulation mode you may check immediately
whether your appliied rules deliver the result you
expected.

Regards,

Wilhelm

Hi,

even after using aide for five years now, I need multiple attempts to
get the regexps right. aide's way of demanding and not demanding
escape backslashes does not seem to be consistent to neither standard,
extended or perl regexps.

Debugging this is quite tedious since the turnaround times are bad
because one needs to do cryptographic operations.

How about having an option which parses the config file and the
filesystem, and outputs for each file found the aide expression that
would be used for this file if a real aide run would be invoked with
this config file.

Greetings
Marc

@hvhaugwitz hvhaugwitz added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 4, 2021
@hvhaugwitz hvhaugwitz added this to the 0.17 milestone Jan 4, 2021
@hvhaugwitz hvhaugwitz added the in progress The development for this issue is in progress label Jan 4, 2021
@hvhaugwitz hvhaugwitz removed the in progress The development for this issue is in progress label May 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants