Feature/committees cosponsors ayesha

[ayeshamk]

No description provided.

[aih]

The copy-to-clipboard and download CSV features are great!

Sorting does not appear to be working:
http://localhost:8000/bills/116hr1500
This correctly shows the † and * for sponsor and original cosponsor, respectively, but the top of the list should be: a) the sponsor (Maxine Waters) and any member with rank 1 on a committee of jurisdiction (also Maxine Waters). The others (I think) should be shown in rank order.

[ayeshamk]

Per discussion on Tuesday with Daniel, I implemented the following sorting logic. Find my comment below after the meeting. #306 (comment)

[aih]

From your comment in #306:

1. Original bill sponsors (D/R) -- Sources for 'in Focus' information  #1 and Adam's Sandbox #2 sponsors if they are of different parties, otherwise only the 1st sponsor.

2. Co-sponsors with rank 1.

In 116hr1500, Maxine Waters is both the sponsor and a sponsor with rank 1, so she should be shown first.

[ayeshamk]

From your comment in #306:

1. Original bill sponsors (D/R) -- Sources for 'in Focus' information  #1 and Adam's Sandbox #2 sponsors if they are of different parties, otherwise only the 1st sponsor.

1. Co-sponsors with rank 1.

In 116hr1500, Maxine Waters is both the sponsor and a sponsor with rank 1, so she should be shown first.

I picked co-sponsors in the sort, it looks like. I'll add sponsors too.

[aih]

And after that, any rank 1 cospsonsors

[ayeshamk]

Changed. Working as expected.

[aih]

Confirmed

[ayeshamk]

@aih Looks like the merges changed the sorting logic. The orders are different now than what I posted before above for 116hr1500. Here is a screenshot of what we have now on the site:

Here is what I originally implemented:

The results are the same; it is still showing the expected list. However, the orders are different.

[ayeshamk]

It is ordered alphabetically now. We do not want the sorting options in the top menu. Daniel asked them to be removed.

[aih]

@ayeshamk I believe this is a browser cache issue. Check that the version number is 0.3.0. This version is tied to the git tag; I'll add git tags to future significant updates as well, so we can confirm that the expected version is in the UI.

[ayeshamk]

@aih I see the expected behavior from an incognito window.