Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
69 lines (43 loc) · 6.35 KB

models.md

File metadata and controls

69 lines (43 loc) · 6.35 KB

Description of Models and Algorithms

Convert images to signal

First step is preprocessing: an image is auto-rotated so that grid lines are orthogonal to the edges of the image, adjusted with brightness and contrast equalization. After this, all shadows are removed. Then the RGB-format image is converted to grayscale for further work.

Second step is grid detection. Image is binarized and grid lines are separated from the signal using adaptive thresholding. After that, the algorithm evaluates the scale with the pixel-counting approach - calculating all spacings between grid lines. The scale is used to convert the signal from units of pixels to millimeters.

Third step is signal detection. The grayscale image is binarized using adaptive thresholding with Otsu's method. Then the binarized image is filtered with the median filter to remove noise (separate located pixels).

The final step is signal extraction - the list of all connected pixels of the signal is converted to the 1D array where pixels are scaled and represent amplitudes of the signal.

The method is evaluated by calculating the average deviation between samples of the original and converted signals: images with daylight - 0.18mV, images with electric light - 0.14mV, images with bad lighting - 0.12mV.

Check ST elevation

The ST segment elevation in lead V3 (STE60) in millivolts is compared to the threshold from medical practice (0.2 mV) [1]. If the ST elevation value exceeds the threshold, it is considered significant. The distribution of normal and elevated ST recordings from the 'China Physiological Signal Challenge 2018' [2] dataset are shown in the normalized density histogram below.

ste_histogram

ST elevation is measured from the P-wave offset point at 60 ms after the J point (QRS offset). ECG features are detected using the Neurokit2 library [3].

[1] - Ivan C. Rokos, William J. French, Amal Mattu, Graham Nichol, Michael E. Farkouh, James Reiffel, Gregg W. Stone, Appropriate Cardiac Cath Lab activation: Optimizing electrocardiogram interpretation and clinical decision-making for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, American Heart Journal, Volume 160, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 995-1003.e8, ISSN 0002-8703, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.08.011.

[2] - F. F. Liu, C. Y. Liu*, L. N. Zhao, X. Y. Zhang, X. L. Wu, X. Y. Xu, Y. L. Liu, C. Y. Ma, S. S. Wei, Z. Q. He, J. Q. Li and N. Y. Kwee. An open access database for evaluating the algorithms of ECG rhythm and morphology abnormal detection. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 2018, 8(7): 1368–1373.

[3] - Makowski, D., Pham, T., Lau, Z. J., Brammer, J. C., Lespinasse, F., Pham, H., Schölzel, C., & Chen, S. A. (2021). NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y

Detect risk markers

Risk markers include ST segment elevation in lead V3 (STE60) in millimeters, the corrected QT interval (QTc) in milliseconds and R-peak amplitude in lead V4 (RA) in millimeters. ST elevation and R-peak amplitude are measured from the PR segment, the P-wave offset point to be precise. ST elevation is measured at 60 ms after the J point (QRS offset). QTc is calculated using the Bazett formula [1]. All ECG features with the exception of the QRS onset and T-wave offset points are detected using the Neurokit2 library [2]. QRS onset points and T-wave offset points are detected using the gradient based approach [3].

[1] - BAZETT, H.C. (1997), AN ANALYSIS OF THE TIME-RELATIONS OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS.. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 2: 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474X.1997.tb00325.x

[2] - Makowski, D., Pham, T., Lau, Z. J., Brammer, J. C., Lespinasse, F., Pham, H., Schölzel, C., & Chen, S. A. (2021). NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y

[3] - Mazomenos, Evangelos & Chen, Taihai & Acharyya, Amit & Bhattacharya, A. & Rosengarten, James & Maharatna, Koushik. (2012). A Time-Domain Morphology and Gradient based algorithm for ECG feature extraction. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, ICIT 2012, Proceedings. 10.1109/ICIT.2012.6209924.

Differensial diagnostics by risk markers

Diagnostic is performed via the modified criterion formula [1]. In the original paper if the value of the equation ([1.196 * ST segment elevation 60 ms after the J point in lead V3 in mm] + [0.059 * QTc in ms] – [0.326 * R-wave amplitude in lead V4 in mm]) is greater than 23.4 the diagnosis is STEMI and if less than or equal to 23.4, the diagnosis is early repolarization.

The original formula was modified by adding a maximal R-peak amplitude parameter and the coefficient values were optimized by a logistic regression model with SGD learning. The original criterion formula has shown the balanced accuracy score of 0.73 on our data, whereas the modified formula has shown the balanced accuracy score of 0.82.

The modified formula is as follows: (2.9 * [STE60 V3 in mm]) + (0.3 * [QTc in ms]) + (-1.7 * np.minimum([RA V4 in mm], 19)) >= 126.9

If tuned == False (default) the original criterion formula is used. Otherwise, if tuned == True the modified formula is used.

[1] - Smith SW, Khalil A, Henry TD, Rosas M, Chang RJ, Heller K, Scharrer E, Ghorashi M, Pearce LA. Electrocardiographic differentiation of early repolarization from subtle anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):45-56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Apr 19. PMID: 22520989.

Diagnostics with neural networks

The ECG Recognition Library also provides neural network (NN) based methods for checking significant ST-elevation and performing differential diagnostics of BER and MI.

All NN-based methods use custom CNN architectures [1]. NN-based diagnostics is explained with GradCAM visualization [2].

[1] - Krizhevsky, Alex & Sutskever, Ilya & Hinton, Geoffrey. (2012). ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Neural Information Processing Systems. 25. 10.1145/3065386.

[2] - R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh and D. Batra, "Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization," 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017, pp. 618-626, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74.