Issue with Version.method_defined? :object_changes

[vkhater]

Hi,

In development mode Version.method_defined? :object_changes always seems to be returning false. Can we use Version.column_names.include?("object_changes") instead? Something I am missing here?

>> Version.method_defined? :object_changes
>>  => false

BTW. Great plugin. Appreciate the work you have put in to it.

[airblade]

Funnily enough looking into method_defined? is already on my to-do list. It was introduced in a recent pull request and, since it passed the tests, I accepted it while deferring my checking until later. It seems I was too lazy! Sorry about that.

I'm running out the door now but I'll fix this up later on when I get back. I'll either go with your suggestion or responds_to?.

[edtsech]

Yes, it's strange. I have also this issue in my development environment but 'with-changes' feature works fine.

Version.method_defined? :object_changes
=> false
Version.find(46).changeset
=> {"post_id"=>[1, 10]} 

@vkhater, 'with-changes' feature work for you?

I agree that Version.column_names.include?("object_changes") or respond_to? maybe will be better.

[vkhater]

@edtsech, my guess to Version.find(46).changeset works fine is since the Version class is already instantiated. Even this works..

Version.new
Version.method_defined? :obect_changes
=> true

[edtsech]

Added pull request #75, hope it closes this issue.

[airblade]

Thanks to @edstech's pull request, this should be fixed in v2.2.9.

[vkhater]

Thanks @airblade and @edtsech for the fix :)

[edtsech]

Thank you for report!