Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ship the udev rules upstream #82

Closed
AsciiWolf opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Ship the udev rules upstream #82

AsciiWolf opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@AsciiWolf
Copy link

AsciiWolf commented Nov 4, 2021

Please, consider submitting the udev rules to upstream (systemd). Here is an example how to do it: systemd/systemd#20561

Without this, it is not possible to use Airspy SDR devices in Flatpak and other special configurations where it is not possible to install the Airspy libs/udev rules system-wide.

@bvernoux
Copy link
Member

bvernoux commented Nov 5, 2021

You are welcome if you want to do a pull request of the AirSpy udev rules to systemd and maintain it.
Note: It is first time I see it and I have never used Flatpak on GNU/Linux distribution (I'm mainly using Ubuntu/Xubuntu without any issue)

@AsciiWolf
Copy link
Author

It's not just Flatpak. AppImage apps, portable apps and basically all apps that cannot install custom things into the system /usr or /etc have the same problem. It is common on GNU/Linux that udev rules are shipped in upstream (udevd, which is now part of systemd). Missing udev rules are basically the only thing that prevents most of these devices from working out-of-box on Linux (airspy/rtl-sdr/etc. libs can be bundled as a part of the SDR app without being installed system-wide). I have created the same ticket for rtl-sdr as well and will consider submitting the Airspy udev rules myself after the rtl-sdr ones are submitted.

@bvernoux
Copy link
Member

Could you provide an update about that issue ?

@bvernoux bvernoux self-assigned this Feb 25, 2022
@AsciiWolf
Copy link
Author

Sorry, I sadly did not have enough free time to work on this. But if you want to start working on it and submitting the PR yourself, I will be glad to help.

@bvernoux
Copy link
Member

bvernoux commented Feb 25, 2022

Thanks for your offer but I do not have time to work on that
So I close this issue, if someone is interested to add that feature a Pull Request is welcome

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants