Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebase on original on GitHub #9

Open
akaihola opened this issue May 7, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Rebase on original on GitHub #9

akaihola opened this issue May 7, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@akaihola
Copy link
Owner

akaihola commented May 7, 2018

It seems that @JohnVillalovos has moved the source code of hardlinkpy from Google Code as well. I'm not sure if that happened before or after I created this repository.

John's repository seems to have also imported original issues from Google Code.

I wonder if it would be still possible to make this repository be based on John's original one. We could then open merge requests for our changes to be incorporated into the original author's version. Although I'm not sure whether John is still willing to maintain this software or if he agrees with the changes we have.

The instructions in the Git rebase from remote fork repo Gist may or may not apply.

@jamescassell
Copy link
Collaborator

jamescassell commented May 7, 2018

It's unfortunate that history was lost in the other repo. Perhaps it's possible to do a straight diff. Your repo does have the history, which I like. The other one has all the issues, which is convenient.

edit: looks like the other repo was created in Nov 2015: https://github.com/JohnVillalovos?tab=overview&from=2015-11-01&to=2015-12-31

@akaihola
Copy link
Owner Author

akaihola commented May 9, 2018

Oh, you're right, John's repo doesn't actually contain the commit history.

Would it then actually make more sense to just copy the issues over from his repository? Is there a tool for that or should we just copy-paste?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants