Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve temperature labels for the Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H and IT8718F #18

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jun 5, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I'm sending report of open-hardware-monitor and screen-shot of gigabyte
Easy Tune6. Between programs are differences in temperature sensors.
And in your program is not has processor speed clock.
My system is windows7 home 64bit


Original issue reported on code.google.com by jotbe...@gmail.com on 18 Mar 2010 at 3:47

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Do you have a constant offset between the temperatures? Because usually 1-2°C
difference can just come from reading at (slightly) different times, where the 
sensor
shows another value.

Processor clock speed is not yet implemented for AMD CPUs, but this will be 
added.

Original comment by moel.mich on 18 Mar 2010 at 8:01

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I was think about misplaced temperature sensors. I mentioned it on screen-shot. 
I do
not know about reading sensors, so a do not criticize, only reporting from user 
point
of view.

Original comment by jotbe...@gmail.com on 19 Mar 2010 at 6:48

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

The only problems I can see, are the not very helpful labels for the 
temperatures in
the Open Hardare Monitor.

The core #1-#4 temperature value is correct (and that value is not read in easy 
tune6).

I will change this issue into an enhancement request for the temperature labels 
on
the Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H.

Original comment by moel.mich on 22 Mar 2010 at 1:20

  • Changed title: Improve temperature labels for the Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H and IT8718F
  • Changed state: Accepted
  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This issue was closed by revision r156.

Original comment by moel.mich on 24 May 2010 at 3:31

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant