Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix [unit_converter]: Update unit_converter to API v2.1 #190

Closed

Conversation

Pete-Hamlin
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the unit_converter python extension to work with API 2.1. Also added support for a GlobalQueryHandler via the settings.

@DenverCoder1 I added myself as a maintainer as I'm happy to keep an eye on this one in case of breaking API changes. As this is your work though I'm happy to remove myself if you would prefer it.



md_iid = '2.0'
md_iid = "2.1"
md_version = "1.4"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update the version if you change the extension.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, fixed in 1d34d57

@Pete-Hamlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Been having some weird performance issues since having this plugin activated.

Going to do a little more R&D before I post up for review, so going to close this for now.

@Pete-Hamlin Pete-Hamlin reopened this Dec 28, 2023
@Pete-Hamlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, have been testing this one for the past month and can confirm that the performance issues were unrelated to this one.

Confident that this is now ready to merge, however may now conflict with #195

@Pete-Hamlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ManuelSchneid3r after discussing with @ismasou I think we're good to go ahead and merge this branch and close #195

@fgibaux
Copy link

fgibaux commented Mar 6, 2024

do I understand correctly that the unit converter is not coming back as both #195 and this have been closed without being merge?

@ManuelSchneid3r
Copy link
Member

Happened accidentally. the change of the default branch automatically closed it.

@ManuelSchneid3r
Copy link
Member

This issue was not intentionally but automatically closed because I renamed the master branch to main. If you are still interested in getting it merged please reopen against main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants