You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
If you have a wide monitor, the scale/number of descriptions is too high (and/or too hard to read/dustinguish) in some zoom levels, here 1, 2, 6, 12, Or perhaps only if the card is shown in maximal width.
If I have the window a little bit smaler, it is ok.
Is it possible to improve it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Finding a good time tick distribution for all screen widths is tricky, considering there are additional limitations due to the horizontal scrolling or you'll get jumping ticks while you move through the graphs. Can't promise an eta, but I'll look into it.
But I think, this is not really screen width related. Because it is happening always, when the cards are displayed in full default HA width. At least here. But of course, not critical. But I wonder if this was the case from the beginning or came with one of the great iterations.
If you have a wide monitor, the scale/number of descriptions is too high (and/or too hard to read/dustinguish) in some zoom levels, here 1, 2, 6, 12, Or perhaps only if the card is shown in maximal width.
If I have the window a little bit smaler, it is ok.
Is it possible to improve it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: