Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it useable for heterogeneous graph? #3

Open
zdh2292390 opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Is it useable for heterogeneous graph? #3

zdh2292390 opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@zdh2292390
Copy link

Dear authors,

I am wondering is GraphSVX also useable for heterogeneous graphs? Thanks

@AlexDuvalinho
Copy link
Owner

AlexDuvalinho commented Jun 9, 2022 via email

@zdh2292390
Copy link
Author

zdh2292390 commented Jun 18, 2022

Hi Alex,
Thanks for your reply. I was wondering is there any API in this repository that is compatible with other heterogeneous graph APIs such as the DGL package? Or could you please give an example on how to use GraphSVX in heterogeneous graphs?
Thank you so much!

Hi, GraphSVX is applicable on heterogeneous graphs and makes complete sense. However, it does not distinguish between node / edge types in its explanation, so if you want explanations per node type for instance, you may have to do some post-processing yourself (e.g. aggregating the importance scores per type at the end). Hope this helps, Alexandre

----- Mail original ----- De: "ZhangDenghui" @.> À: "AlexDuvalinho/GraphSVX" @.> Cc: "Subscribed" @.***> Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Juin 2022 00:02:21 Objet: [AlexDuvalinho/GraphSVX] Is it useable for heterogeneous graph? (Issue #3) Dear authors, I am wondering is GraphSVX also useable for heterogeneous graphs? Thanks — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or unsubscribe . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: </issues/3 @ github . com>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants