Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimizing decoding performance #11

Open
bjornekelund opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Optimizing decoding performance #11

bjornekelund opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@bjornekelund
Copy link

bjornekelund commented Mar 26, 2024

The config file suggests using wave files is faster than shared memory. It seems somewhat counter-intuitive but I tried it anyway, using a RAM disk as D:\ and setting transfermethod=wavefile. CWSL_DIGI still reports the shared memories when starting up and I see no noticeable change in CPU load. Is there something I have missed? I decode thirtysomething FT4 and FT8 segments.

Björn SM7IUN

@bjornekelund
Copy link
Author

Doing more tests I can actually see the CPU load increase slightly when using the wavefile transfer method. Could this perhaps be because I use a RAM disk? Also, intuitively, shared memory should be lighter on CPU.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant