Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Journal of Open Source Education publication? #373

Closed
leios opened this issue Sep 11, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Journal of Open Source Education publication? #373

leios opened this issue Sep 11, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
Discussion This is open for a discussion. General On Hold This is on hold.

Comments

@leios
Copy link
Member

leios commented Sep 11, 2018

Hey, I have recently been made aware of a new journal, the Journal of Open Source Education (JOSE). It is similar to the Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) in that the code, itself, is the publication. We simply need to provide a one-page intro to the project (which I should have no trouble writing on my own). I am considering publishing the Algorithm Archive in JOSE because it provides a citable reference so people can use the Algorithm Archive in their own projects.

To be clear: publishing the Algorithm Archive in JOSE does not restrict us from printing a version and publishing in that way later on.

I am curious to hear what you guys think:

  1. Is publishing in JOSE a good idea? Why or why not?
  2. If we do publish in JOSE, how do we determine who is on the author list?
  3. Are there better places to publish the AAA? Should we just wait for a physical copy?

The way I see it, the most up-to-date version of the AAA will always be online, so it makes sense to have a citable online reference. If we do decide to submit to JOSE, there is a lot I would like to do before-hand... so there is time to discuss.

@julianschacher
Copy link
Member

I like the idea to get the AAA out there in a more official way.
Regarding the authors: You are obviously the main author, but in my opinion all contributors are authors as well, so I would include them.
The question is however, how this can be done, since the author list would be dynamic.

  • Maybe stating you as the author and providing a link to the CONTRIBUTORS.md would be an option?
  • If the document can be updated, putting the authors in the .pdf could also be done. I imagine that to maybe get quite messy / long tho, but it would give a more direct attribution / appreciation.

@julianschacher julianschacher added General Discussion This is open for a discussion. labels Sep 11, 2018
@leios
Copy link
Member Author

leios commented Sep 11, 2018

Thanks for the tags.

We can probably publish with Schloss et. al. and explain the et. al. can be found int he CONTRIBUTORS.md file. I feel like the development team should also be considered primary authors, though, especially @julianschacher , @Butt4cak3 , @Gathros , etc.

@leios leios added the On Hold This is on hold. label Dec 23, 2018
@leios
Copy link
Member Author

leios commented Dec 23, 2018

I am putting this on-hold for now. It's a long-term goal, but for now I think we are not stable enough to publish.

@Amaras
Copy link
Member

Amaras commented Apr 18, 2022

Since this was put on hold indefinitely, I'm closing it for now, feel free to reopen it later.

@Amaras Amaras closed this as completed Apr 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion This is open for a discussion. General On Hold This is on hold.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants