Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spatial resolution of output feature maps in each stage #21

Open
tatsy opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Spatial resolution of output feature maps in each stage #21

tatsy opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@tatsy
Copy link

tatsy commented Dec 4, 2020

Thank you very much for sharing the source code of this great project.

I read the paper of Cas-MVSNet and I have wondered that the spatial resolution of the feature maps described in the paper is different from those used in this repo. The paper mentions that the spatial resolution of the feature maps are {1/16, 1/4, 1} of the input image in each stage, but in this repo, {1/4, 1/2, 1} of the input image seem to be used.

Also, I am wondering whether changing the scale_factor of F.interpolate to be 4 (instead of 2) in the following line is enough to reproduce the case of using the feature maps of {1/16, 1/4, 1} sizes.

intra_feat = F.interpolate(intra_feat, scale_factor=2, mode="nearest") + self.inner1(conv1)

Thank you very much for your help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant