Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tanks and Temples reproducing problem and one way might be right? #29

Open
HuanyuanZhou opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@HuanyuanZhou
Copy link

HuanyuanZhou commented Nov 23, 2021

Hi, dear authors. Thank for your great work.When I tried to reproduce the results on the Tanks and Temples dataset, I got many background pixels, especially in "Family", in which the main part lost. I think the reason why there are so many background pixels is that in general_eval.py -> read_cam_file we use self.ndepths=192 but in YaoYao's T&T dataset, for example: Family, the num_depth is 700+.So I annotate the line 72~75 in general_eval.py and get rid of many background pixels, I do not konw if it is a mistake but it really confused me when I tried to reproduce the results on T&T. I want to know when you submit the results to T&T benchmark, how many self.ndepths you use and if you use the num_depth that YaoYao's dataset provide?Hope for your reply.

@wangchengze001
Copy link

please , i want to konw how to change code in order to test T&T datasets, i dont see the depth img and mask img in T&T datasets

@zhao-you-fei
Copy link

@HuanyuanZhou May I ask how this code fuses the point cloud generated by the Tanks and Temples dataset.
Looking forward to your reply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants