Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Misc] Port -XX:ArrayAllocationWarningSize from Dragonwell8 #3

Closed
luchsh opened this issue Dec 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

[Misc] Port -XX:ArrayAllocationWarningSize from Dragonwell8 #3

luchsh opened this issue Dec 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@luchsh

Comments

@luchsh
Copy link
Contributor

luchsh commented Dec 23, 2019

Description
Port following patch from Dragonwell8
dragonwell-project/dragonwell8_hotspot@5677a71

Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. not a bug

Expected behavior
All tests from hotspot/jtreg/runtime/memory should pass

JDK version

openjdk version "11.0.5.1-preview" 2019-12-23
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Alibaba Dragonwell) (build 11.0.5.1-preview+0)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Alibaba Dragonwell) (build 11.0.5.1-preview+0, mixed mode)

Execution environment

  • OS and version: linux
  • CPU model: x64
  • Number of CPU cores:
  • Size of physical memory:
  • Inside Linux container?
    • Linux container name (docker, pouch, etc):
    • Linux container version:
@luchsh luchsh self-assigned this Dec 23, 2019
@luchsh luchsh mentioned this issue Dec 23, 2019
Merged
luchsh pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 27, 2019
@luchsh
[Runtime] Added large array allocation warning
0261880 
Summary:
ported from Dragonwell 8, added new flag ArrayAllocationWarningSize
to warn allocation of large arrays

Test Plan: test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/memory

Reviewed-by: kuaiwei

Issue: #3
@luchsh luchsh closed this as completed Dec 27, 2019
@a11enhuang a11enhuang mentioned this issue Dec 6, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@luchsh luchsh

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@luchsh