Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Algo] ViTDet algo development #3

Closed
wenmengzhou opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #35
Closed

[Algo] ViTDet algo development #3

wenmengzhou opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #35
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects

Comments

@wenmengzhou
Copy link
Collaborator

reimplement the work described in https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16527

@wenmengzhou wenmengzhou created this issue from a note in Algorithms (To do) Apr 6, 2022
@wenmengzhou wenmengzhou added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2022
@tuofeilunhifi tuofeilunhifi linked a pull request Apr 26, 2022 that will close this issue
@zugofn
Copy link

zugofn commented May 16, 2022

Hi!
Thank you for your great code job!
Do you have plan to implement the convolutional propagation in the paper?

@wenmengzhou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wenmengzhou commented May 17, 2022

Hi! Thank you for your great code job! Do you have plan to implement the convolutional propagation in the paper?

yes, we have been discussing the implementation details, welcome to join in this discussion #65

@tuofeilunhifi
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! Thank you for your great code job! Do you have plan to implement the convolutional propagation in the paper?

The accuracy of conv aggreation we reproduced is 42.13, so we guess that pre-training of conv aggregation is required

Algorithms automation moved this from To do to Done Jun 10, 2022
Cathy0908 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants