Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Confusing caliber #106

Closed
joneswong opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #234
Closed

Confusing caliber #106

joneswong opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #234
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@joneswong
Copy link
Collaborator

'Results_raw': {'client_individual': {'val_loss': 0.7106942534446716, 'test_loss': 0.7106942534446716, 'test_avg_loss': 0.7106942534446716, 'test_total': 1.0, 'val_avg_loss': 0.7106942534446716, 'val_total': 1.0}, 'client_summarized_weighted_avg': {'val_loss'

It is difficult for users to know client_individual means the best individual results.
@joneswong joneswong added the enhancement New feature or request label May 24, 2022
@yxdyc yxdyc mentioned this issue Jul 14, 2022
Merged
@xieyxclack xieyxclack linked a pull request Jul 14, 2022 that will close this issue
clarify the term "individual" used in logging #234
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

clarify the term "individual" used in logging yxdyc/FederatedScope
1 participant
@joneswong